The Best AI Presentation Agents I've Tried So Far
I put five AI slide-building agents to work on real presentations. Some impressed me, one won me over.
Office productivity has been a major focus for the big AI companies over the past few months, and a lot of professionals now reach for AI tools every day. One of the most popular use cases is making presentation slides. These slide generators caught on fast because they’re so convenient: drop in a document, a URL, or even a short text description, and the tool returns a really good, cohesive deck.
In this guide, I’ll walk through the top five presentation agents I’ve tried over the past year or so:
Genspark AI
Manus AI
Kimi Slides
Claude in Microsoft PowerPoint
Let’s get started.
1. Plus AI: Best for Working Inside PowerPoint and Google Slides
Plus AI is an add-in that puts an agent directly inside the apps you already use to make slides. Rather than living in a separate web app, it sits in PowerPoint and Google Slides and works on your native files, so there are no exports and no broken formatting when you switch back to your own editor.
What makes it an agent and not just a generator is “Agent mode.” You open it from the editing menu and give it a goal, and it plans and runs multi-step actions: building a deck from a prompt, rewriting messy slides, brainstorming new sections, and reformatting layouts.
It can pull from your own slide and icon libraries and connect to other tools through the Plus AI API and MCP server, and it sticks to your branded templates instead of generic ones.
One thing worth knowing: Agent mode is currently built for PowerPoint, while the wider add-in (one-click generation, Remix, slide editing) works in both PowerPoint and Google Slides.
Plus AI is also careful by design. It only uses purpose-built presentation tools, so it won’t run unreviewed code on your machine or in the cloud. For day-to-day work decks, that combination of native files and a focused agent is hard to beat.
Pricing: A 7-day free trial, then $10 per month on the Basic annual plan and $20 per month on Pro.
2. Genspark AI: Best for Research-Driven, Design-Heavy Decks
Genspark started life as an AI search product and grew into an all-in-one workspace built around a “Super Agent.” The agent reads your prompt, decides which models and tools to use, and runs the steps for you. Slides are just one of the things it can produce, alongside research reports, sheets, images, and even phone calls.
The fun part is watching it think. Open AI Slides, type a prompt (say, an analysis of global music streaming in 2025), and Genspark opens a planning view where you can see it break down the request, structure the deck, and decide which data points to include. It feels like a research assistant working out loud.
The output is unusual too. Genspark builds slides as HTML and CSS, so each slide is basically a small web page. The designs come out modern and bold, with gradients and clean typography.
When I asked for a Spotify-style look, it nailed the dark mode and vibrant colors, and the charts were sharp out of the gate. If you know a little code, you can switch to a Code view and edit the raw HTML and Tailwind CSS for control most drag-and-drop editors can’t match.
Pricing: A free plan with 100 credits per day, then Plus at $24.99 per month and Pro at $249.99 per month. That makes it a bit pricier than Plus AI.
3. Manus AI: Best for Decks That Need Real Research Baked In
Manus is a general-purpose agent, and its Slides feature lets you build a full presentation from a single prompt inside the Manus chat interface. Its strength is that it researches the topic itself before it builds anything, instead of just formatting content you hand it.
To try it, create a free account, then describe your topic in the main text box. You can leave the rest of the settings alone, since the agent figures out that you want a slide deck.
I gave it a detailed travel prompt asking for the top 10 adventures around the world, with a punchy name, a short description, a location, and the best season for each. It came back with a 12-slide deck.
What stood out is that it doesn’t just drop random text and images onto slides. It does a bit of research, organizes a structure, generates matching images, and assembles a polished deck. Like Genspark, each slide is built from HTML and CSS, which you can inspect in a Code view.
The catch is that doing all of this inside a chat app, without the familiar controls of PowerPoint or Google Slides, can feel overwhelming if you aren’t comfortable with prompting. The agent also tends to start generating right away rather than checking the outline with you first.
4. Kimi Slides: Best for Fast Drafts Inside a Chat App
When Moonshot AI added slide-building to its Kimi assistant in late 2025, I thought it might be the end of Google Slides and PowerPoint. The agent could turn a simple prompt or a document into a clean deck, and it can browse the web for context, which helps a lot with timely or research-heavy topics.
The more I used it, though, the more the limits showed. First, when I needed to keep working in PowerPoint, I had to export from Kimi and re-import the file, an extra step that gets old fast when you’re short on time. Second, the design control is thin.
Because the chat interface is built to be simple, you can’t freely adjust fonts, drag shapes and text boxes around, pick your own template, or add animations. Third, the free credits run out quickly, so consistent use means paying for a subscription.
5. Claude in Microsoft PowerPoint: Best for Microsoft 365 Teams Already on Claude
Claude’s official add-in brings an agent into PowerPoint itself. You install it from the Microsoft Marketplace (or from Home > Add-ins inside PowerPoint), sign in with your Anthropic account, and grant it access. From there it reads your deck’s slide master, layouts, fonts, and colors, then generates native, editable slides that match your template instead of generic ones.
It works as a co-author rather than a separate tool. You can give it a source like a PDF, a spreadsheet, or a website URL and ask it to build a deck, then keep refining with pinpoint edits: rewrite a slide, add a section, turn bullets into a chart, all without leaving PowerPoint. For deck generation I’d pick the most capable model available (the latest Opus model), and switch to a lighter model like Sonnet for small edits.
A few honest notes from testing. The add-in lives on paid Claude plans, so a free account won’t get you far. Generation can stall or fail partway through, which means starting over, and there’s no history to undo a change.
Claude can also make mistakes, so review every slide before you finalize anything important. If you live in Microsoft 365 and already use Claude, it’s a natural fit, with the rough edges of a young product.
Which AI Agent Is My Top Pick?
My top pick is Plus AI, mostly because it removes the step that slows the others down. Genspark and Manus produce striking, research-backed decks, but they build inside their own web apps, so polishing in PowerPoint or Google Slides means exporting and reformatting.
Kimi has the same friction. Claude for PowerPoint avoids it by working in your deck, and it’s the strongest option if your team is standardized on Microsoft 365, though it’s still maturing.
Plus AI’s edge is that it runs as an agent right where the rest of my work already happens, on native files, with my own templates and brand. The others are excellent for different jobs: reach for Genspark or Manus when you want a visually ambitious deck with research done for you, and Kimi when you just need a fast draft.
For everyday work presentations I want finished and on-brand, Plus AI is the one I open first.
Final Thoughts
These five agents cover most of what people actually need from AI slides today. Plus AI works inside PowerPoint and Google Slides, Genspark and Manus research and design from a single prompt, Kimi turns out quick drafts in a chat app, and Claude builds editable decks straight into your PowerPoint template.
If you only try one, make it Plus AI. The 7-day free trial is enough to feel the difference, and because it’s an add-in for both Microsoft PowerPoint and Google Slides, you can test it without changing how you already work or learning a new app.
What about you? If you’ve used any of these AI presentation agents, or one I didn’t cover, I’d love to hear which works best for you in the comments.
Hi there! Thanks for making it to the end of this post! If you enjoyed this content and would like to support my work, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support means a lot!
Thanks - very useful. I'm surprised you didn't include Gamma which does a great job of research and slide generation, with a generous free allocation.